In the enchanting world of filmmaking, a captivating question often swirls through the minds of creators and enthusiasts: “Which is more expensive animation or live action?” 

In the few paragraphs following, we’ll dissect the factors that influence the price tags of these two distinct art forms, shedding light on which comes out as the costlier venture.

Which Is More Expensive Animation Or Live Action?

Which Is More Expensive Animation Or Live Action?
Which Is More Expensive Animation Or Live Action?

Live action is generally more expensive than animation. This is because live-action productions require more resources, such as actors, crew members, sets and locations, costumes and props, and special effects.

Here is a general comparison of the costs of animation and live action:

Type of productionCost range
Animated video (2-minute)$15,000-$35,000
Live-action video (2-minute)$17,000-$100,000+

However, animation can still be expensive, especially if the project is complex or requires a lot of special effects. The cost of animation and live-action can vary widely depending on several factors, including:

#1. Complexity of the Project

Animation can range from simple 2D cartoons to complex 3D computer-generated imagery (CGI). Similarly, live-action projects can vary in complexity from low-budget indie films to high-end Hollywood blockbusters.

Therefore, more complex animation or live-action productions tend to be more expensive.

#2. Production Time

Animation projects often require more time for pre-production, including storyboarding and creating assets. Meanwhile, live-action projects might have longer shoot times and post-production processes like editing and special effects.

#3. Labor Costs

Both animation and live-action require skilled professionals, such as animators, directors, actors, and crew members. Labor costs can vary widely based on the expertise and experience of the individuals involved.

#4. Location and Sets

Live-action projects often involve the cost of location scouting, building sets, and renting equipment. On the other hand, animation may require creating digital environments and characters, which can also be costly.

#5. Visual Effects

Both animation and live-action may require visual effects (VFX) work. Complex VFX can drive up the cost of both types of production.

Ultimately, the best way to determine which type of production is right for you is to talk to a qualified producer or director. They can help you assess your needs and budget and recommend the best approach for your project.

Visual effects of animation vs live-action
Visual effects of animation vs live-action

>>>Read more: How much a professional animation studio charge for one minute animation? How much Animost charge?

Animation vs. Live-Action Pros & Cons

Animation and live-action each have their own pros and cons, depending on the type of project, budget, and creative vision. Here’s an overview of some key advantages and disadvantages of both approaches:



  • Creative freedom: Animation is not limited by the laws of physics or the constraints of the real world. Animators can create any kind of world or character they can imagine.
  • Versatility: Animation can be used to create a wide range of content, from explainer videos to feature films.
  • Cost-effectiveness: Animation can be more cost-effective than live action, especially for productions with complex visuals or many special effects.


  • Time-consuming: Animation can be a time-consuming process, especially for complex projects.
  • Skill required: Animation requires specialized skills and knowledge.
  • Less realistic: Animation can be less realistic than live action, which may not be suitable for all projects.




  • Realism: Live-action productions can offer a greater degree of realism than animation.
  • Emotional impact: Live action can be more effective at conveying emotion and realism than animation.
  • Actor performances: Live-action productions can benefit from the performances of talented actors.


  • Cost: Live-action productions can be more expensive than animation, especially for productions with complex visuals or many special effects.
  • Logistics: Live-action productions can be more logistically challenging than animation, as they require actors, crew members, sets, and locations.
  • Safety: Live-action productions can be more dangerous than animation, especially for productions that involve stunts or special effects.


Why is live-action more expensive than animation?

Live-action is often more expensive than animation because it requires physical sets, props, actors, costumes, and extensive post-production work.

Additionally, live-action shoots involve location expenses, labor costs, and the unpredictability of real-world elements, which can drive up production costs.

Which is better animation or live-action?

Neither animation nor live-action is inherently better; it depends on the project’s goals and creative vision. Animation offers more creative freedom and can bring fantastical worlds to life, while live-action can provide a realistic and relatable human element.

Is animation harder than live-action?

Animation and live-action both have their challenges. The difficulty depends on the specific project and skill set of the creators.

Animation demands meticulous planning, attention to detail, and a strong grasp of artistic principles. Live-action requires managing real-world logistics, actors’ performances, and the unpredictable nature of live shooting. 


Which is more expensive animation or live action? While live action often entails significant expenses in location, cast, and equipment, animation requires substantial investments in technology and skilled labor. 

Ultimately, the answer depends on your project’s scope and creative choices, making it a subjective and ever-shifting narrative.

Animost – Vietnam 3D Animation Studio

animost team

year end party animost team